Red Deer Minute: Issue 275

Red Deer Minute - Your weekly one-minute summary of Red Deer politics

📅 This Week In Red Deer: 📅

• The Audit Committee will meet tomorrow at 1:00 pm, and one of the items on the agenda is a proposal to stop approving the City's budgets one year at a time. Chief Financial Officer Sam Mugford is asking the Committee to endorse a three-year operating budget covering 2028 to 2030 and a four-year capital budget covering 2028 to 2031, with a shift to four-year operating budgets after that. Council would still approve a figure for each calendar year and could amend future years, but the yearly approval debate would be replaced by an annual review. Red Deer ran two-year operating budgets for 2021-22 and 2023-24 before returning to single-year budgeting in 2025, so this would be a revival of a longer cycle rather than a first attempt. Administration undertook no public participation on the report, describing the change as the design of an internal financial governance process.
  
  
• Also on tomorrow's agenda is a rewritten debt policy that would remove the City's own borrowing ceiling. Under the policy in force now, provincial regulation limits municipal debt to 1.5 times a city's revenue, and Council holds Red Deer to 75% of that provincial maximum. The draft drops the 75% figure and sets out principles instead: debt limited to capital assets with long useful lives, a ban on internal borrowing, borrowing terms that cannot exceed the life of the asset financed, and Council approval for every debt. Administration is also asking Council to rescind a 2011 policy that caps the interest rate on City debenture borrowing, arguing that borrowing terms will now be managed within the broader framework. The existing debt policy was adopted in 2013 and last revised in 2017, and this rewrite is one of six financial policies under review through the City's Financial Roadmap. No public participation was undertaken, and the replacement policy would be reviewed once per Council term. 
  
  
• The City has released its proposed 2027 Utilities Budget for public review, and Council will debate it on September 29th. The budget covers drinking water, wastewater treatment, electricity distribution, and waste management, and the City says it funds infrastructure renewal and replacement, modernization initiatives, and operational improvements across those systems. Chief Financial Officer Sam Mugford claims the proposal balances affordability against the investment needed as utility systems age and costs rise. If Council approves the budget, it will set the revenue the utilities must collect, and Administration will return later this fall with recommended utility rates through a separate bylaw.
  
  
• City Council voted unanimously on September 15th to direct nearly $3 million in federal housing money into permanent supportive housing. The money was the first instalment of a $12-million Housing Accelerator Fund grant that the federal government cancelled earlier this year after the City did not adopt the four-units-as-of-right zoning the program required. Housing and Infrastructure Minister Gregor Robertson wrote on July 22nd confirming that Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation would not seek repayment of the money already advanced. Council directed $2,938,682 of it to a grant that housing providers will bid for through a request for proposals, and $150,000 to a housing strategy whose scope has not yet been set. Mayor Cindy Jefferies said the decision turns available funding into "more doors and more homes", though the number of units will not be known until the proposals are in.
  
  
• At the same September 15th meeting, Councillor Tristin Brisbois withdrew a notice of motion after rewording it from a proposal for an Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee into one exploring a Community Perspectives Advisory Committee. Brisbois said the motion only asked Administration to look at whether such a resource would be of value to Council, and whether a committee was even the right mechanism for it. Several Councillors said they had received negative emails and calls about the original wording, which Brisbois said she had not expected to cause so much backlash. Councillor Kraymer Barnstable argued it would make more sense to start a fresh notice of motion than to rebrand one because of negative community feedback. Councillor Jaelene Tweedle objected from the other direction, saying the intent had completely changed and no longer focused enough on anti-racism. Brisbois withdrew the motion after the discussion. 

🚨 This Week’s Action Item: 🚨

🪙 This Week’s Sponsor: 🪙

This week's sponsor is you! We don't have big corporate backers, so if you like what you're reading, please consider making a donation or signing up as a monthly member.

Having said that, if you are a local business and are interested in being a sponsor, send us an email and we'll talk!